Which situation is not appropriate for the use of control devices against active resistance?

The use of control devices, such as pepper spray or tasers, is intended to manage individuals who are actively resisting law enforcement's efforts to maintain order or enforce the law. When assessing the appropriateness of using these devices, it's crucial to consider the nature of the individual's actions.

In the context of peaceful civil disobedience, individuals are typically expressing their views or protesting without aggression or violence. Using control devices in this scenario undermines the principle of free expression and can escalate a situation that is otherwise non-threatening. Law enforcement is generally expected to facilitate the right to peaceful assembly, and the use of force in such instances is not warranted and could lead to negative consequences, both legally and socially.

In contrast, situations involving riots, fleeing suspects, or violent confrontations present clear threats to officer safety or public safety, thus justifying a more forceful response. In these cases, control devices may be seen as necessary tools for managing the situation effectively.