What strategy should be employed if a subject refuses to cooperate during arbitration?

Offering the subject two choices is an effective strategy because it engages them in the decision-making process while still allowing for control over the situation. This approach can help to reduce resistance, as providing choices empowers the individual and can lead to their willingness to cooperate. When subjects feel they have a say in the outcome, they may be more inclined to buy into the process and reach a resolution.

This method can also help to clarify what the consequences of each choice are, providing the subject with an understanding of how their actions will affect the situation. It redirects their focus and opens up communication pathways, which can lead to successful arbitration outcomes.

This strategy is particularly useful in conflict resolution scenarios where a subject is initially uncooperative, as it can help de-escalate tensions and encourage a collaborative atmosphere. By contrast, making a demand without options can exacerbate the situation, while removing oneself may leave the conflict unresolved. A formal complaint would further complicate the matter and may not address the immediate need for cooperation and resolution.